Slack is becoming ubiquitous in the workplace, replacing email as a faster and more effective means of communication between colleagues. I use it in the office, in the subway, we even use it to organize companies at the university. But, as the zeitgeist dictates, she has been the victim of the subtones of sexism, where men tend to dominate public channels and their female counterparts self-censor, limiting their conversations, opinions and ideas to private channels.
For me, this is simply a symptom of a wider work dynamic, in which women, although not exclusively or universally, feel less empowered, more marginalized and eager to express their opinions. As they say Leah hassler , «Women are more likely to use friendly and supportive punctuation and to change their opinions with fences such as» I could be wrong, but … «
One of the ways this manifests itself is mansplaining, a feat in which men explain women’s things in a patriarchal and condescending way. Any woman, professional or not, will have a crime at some point in her life. It is often well-intentioned, led by family, friends and colleagues, but that is not important. It is humiliating for women to be condescending and to further strengthen the power structures that favor men; men become informed saviors, grateful and incompetent women saved. This is a mythology that needs demystification.
Everyone welcomes Slack, whose developers are working on a digital homologation recognition tool and use the data to correct problematic communication styles. CEO Stewart Butterfield proclaimed that he was «really interested in the idea of personal analysis.»
«These are analyzes that no one else has access to except you,» he said Quartz . «And it doesn’t present you with any real moral value, but [responden preguntas como]Do you talk to men differently than you do to women? Do you talk to different support groups than your superiors? Do you speak in public differently from how you speak in private? «
Slack staff develops an analytical tool that will be able to identify when these personal communication styles are implemented. «Our plan for the next few years is to expand this as much as possible, to provide customers with information about their organizations and individuals,» says Butterfield. The service could then be used to identify problematic interactions or dysfunctional relationships within teams.
Anyone who calls more than a little surveillance is right to be wrong about caution, and privacy is something Slack takes seriously. «It’s a difficult area because you want people to feel empowered by the feedback they get and the tools they use, without them feeling followed,» says Butterfield. Therefore, the instrument is currently limited to the fields of research and development.
But Butterfield insists it would be a definite force: «So if their result [datos] It’s not “Hey, you’re an idiot and we’re firing you,” but “Hey, it turns out we’ve identified some issues with communication, management structure, or organizational design that inhibit the kind of progress we want to make, and so we «It’s okay,» he explained. . In addition, employers who monitor employee interactions are unprecedented: «Most of our large corporate clients have provisions for employees that already give them the right to access all employee communications,» he said.
Personally, I totally agree. Mansplaining is furious at best and downright humiliating at work. Greetings to Slack for understanding this and taking steps to correct it. Or, as I like to say, don’t cut mansplainers anywhere … weakness .